Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -ProfitPoint
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-13 07:32:34
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- People in Lebanon are robbing banks and staging sit-ins to access their own savings
- Nordstrom Rack 62% Off Handbag Deals: Kate Spade, Béis, Marc Jacobs, Longchamp, and More
- Lily-Rose Depp Reaches New Milestone With Love of My Life 070 Shake
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- The sports ticket price enigma
- Chicago officers under investigation over sexual misconduct allegations involving migrants living at police station
- Dozens hurt in Manhattan collision involving double-decker tour bus
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- How Britain Ended Its Coal Addiction
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- H&M's 60% Off Summer Sale Has Hundreds of Trendy Styles Starting at $4
- Trump says he'd bring back travel ban that's even bigger than before
- In defense of gift giving
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Anthropologie Quietly Added Thousands of New Items to Their Sale Section: Get a $110 Skirt for $20 & More
- How an 11-year-old Iowa superfan got to meet her pop idol, Michael McDonald
- We battle Planet Money for indicator of the year
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
If You Can't Stand Denim Shorts, These Alternative Options Will Save Your Summer
Minnesota and the District of Columbia Allege Climate Change Deception by Big Oil
Super-Polluting Methane Emissions Twice Federal Estimates in Permian Basin, Study Finds
Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
Fox News' Sean Hannity says he knew all along Trump lost the election
You'll Whoop It up Over This Real Housewives of Orange County Gift Guide
From Twitter chaos to TikTok bans to the metaverse, social media had a rocky 2022