Current:Home > MyHouse rejects bid to censure Adam Schiff over Trump investigations -ProfitPoint
House rejects bid to censure Adam Schiff over Trump investigations
View
Date:2025-04-26 13:00:01
Washington — The House voted on Wednesday to reject a GOP-backed resolution to censure Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff for his role in congressional investigations of former President Donald Trump, effectively killing the effort to publicly reprimand him.
House Democrats moved to table a resolution introduced by Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, an ardent Trump supporter. The motion succeeded by a vote of 225 to 196, with 20 Republicans voting with Democrats. It needed a simple majority to pass.
"I'm astounded by the vote," Schiff told reporters. "It was basically almost one out of every 10 Republicans voted against this resolution."
The resolution called for the House Ethics Committee to investigate Schiff, the former chair of the House Intelligence Committee and current candidate for Senate in California, and said he should be fined $16 million if the committee determines he "lied, made misrepresentations, and abused sensitive information." Luna said the fine represents half the cost of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into possible ties between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia.
Schiff has been one of Trump's most ardent and high-profile critics for years, having served as the House's lead prosecutor in Trump's first impeachment trial. In a letter to colleagues on Tuesday, Schiff wrote that the effort to censure him was "not only a terrible misuse of House precedent and resources, but a clear attack on our constitutional system of checks and balances."
Censure is essentially a public reprimand by the House to punish misconduct that falls short of warranting expulsion. Twenty-four House lawmakers have been censured in U.S. history, most recently in 2021, when GOP Rep. Paul Gosar was censured for tweeting a video depicting violence against President Biden and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
The censure resolution alleged Schiff "purposely deceived his Committee, Congress, and the American people" and "used his position and access to sensitive information to instigate a fraudulently based investigation, which he then used to amass political gain and fundraising dollars." It also accused him of acting "dishonestly and dishonorably."
Following the vote to table the resolution, Luna said she would try again next week.
Schiff said Tuesday the resolution was an effort to distract from Trump being indicted on federal charges for his alleged mishandling of classified information after he left the White House, as well as retaliation for Schiff voting to impeach Trump.
"This is political payback. But it's also, frankly, quite flattering. They must view me as very effective. They want to go after me to gratify the former president," Schiff told CNN on Tuesday. "But it will do harm to the House to bring this kind of frivolous censure resolution."
Schiff said the effort to censure him would not silence or intimidate him.
Luna introduced the resolution to censure Schiff on the same day that Trump pleaded not guilty to charges that he kept and hid classified documents, and then obstructed the government's efforts to retrieve them.
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky said earlier Wednesday that he would vote to table the resolution because he considered the proposed fine against Schiff to be unconstitutional. Though he added that he thought Schiff "acted unethically."
"The Constitution says the House may make its own rules but we can't violate other (later) provisions of the Constitution," Massie tweeted. "A $16 million fine is a violation of the 27th and 8th amendments."
Massie said later Wednesday he was told "a Constitutional version will be offered now."
Nikole Killion contributed reporting.
- In:
- Adam Schiff
- Donald Trump
- United States House of Representatives
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter for CBS News Digital. Reach her at caitlin.yilek@cbsinteractive.com. Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hausofcait
TwitterveryGood! (2)
Related
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Billy Porter and Husband Adam Smith Break Up After 6 Years
- Gen Z workers are exhausted — and seeking solutions
- These are some of the people who'll be impacted if the U.S. defaults on its debts
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Mexican Drought Spurs a South Texas Water Crisis
- A Natural Ecology Lab Along the Delaware River in the First State to Require K-12 Climate Education
- Insurance firms need more climate change information. Scientists say they can help
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Score Up to 60% Off On Good American Jeans, Dresses, and More At Nordstrom Rack
Ranking
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Does Michael Jordan Approve of His Son Marcus Dating Larsa Pippen? He Says...
- Green energy gridlock
- Taco John's trademarked 'Taco Tuesday' in 1989. Now Taco Bell is fighting it
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- A Teenage Floridian Has Spent Half His Life Involved in Climate Litigation. He’s Not Giving Up
- Warming Trends: Bill Nye’s New Focus on Climate Change, Bottled Water as a Social Lens and the Coming End of Blacktop
- 3 ways to protect your money if the U.S. defaults on its debt
Recommendation
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
Biden says debt ceiling deal 'very close.' Here's why it remains elusive
An Energy Transition Needs Lots of Power Lines. This 1970s Minnesota Farmers’ Uprising Tried to Block One. What Can it Teach Us?
Green energy gridlock
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Amanda Kloots' Tribute to Nick Cordero On His Death Anniversary Will Bring You to Tears
A Tennessee company is refusing a U.S. request to recall 67 million air bag inflators
Kathy Hilton Shares Cryptic Message Amid Sister Kyle Richards and Mauricio Umansky Divorce Rumors